Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:10:27 02/21/06
Go up one level in this thread
On February 21, 2006 at 12:04:05, Günther Simon wrote: >On February 21, 2006 at 11:19:27, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On February 21, 2006 at 01:30:34, Gabor Szots wrote: >> >>>On February 20, 2006 at 16:19:48, Dieter Eberle wrote: >>> >>>>Hi Gabor, >>>>none of the lines you posted is bad. They may not be played every day by >>>>Kasparov but if you check them with a strong engine like Rybka beta13b you will >>>>find out that the maximal deviation from zero is far below +/- 1, a good result >>>>for a general book in my opinion. >>>>Astonished, Dieter >>> >>>Hi Dieter, >>> >>>I submitted all games with the HS book. I did not claim all the lines were bad. >>>I said the were bizarre. Most of them is too passive to be good. If an engine >>>comes out of the opening with -0.65 (as was the case in Spike vs. Pro Deo) it >>>will probably lose against an opponent of its own caliber. >>> >>>Gábor >> >>I do not agree with it. >> >>-0.65 is not a good predictor of result in the opening. >> >>take the following position from the noomen match >> >>r2q1rk1/3nppbp/b2p1np1/2pP4/8/2N2NP1/PP2PPBP/R1BQ1RK1 w - - 0 11 >> >>Glaurung say 0.65 pawns for white after a minute of search >> >> > >...snip... AFAIK we speak about -0.65 for _White_! after book end >and that is quite different and IMHO already downhill. > >Guenther I do not see the difference. If +0.65 for white can happen when white is not better then +0.65 for black also can happen when black is not better. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.