Author: Terry Ripple
Date: 03:22:36 06/27/99
Go up one level in this thread
On June 27, 1999 at 06:08:25, Brett Clark wrote: >On June 27, 1999 at 01:42:40, Tania Devora wrote: > >> >> >>Hi guys, I have finsihed my first twenty games between the super strong >>Hiarcs7.32 and Fritz5.32 under tournaments controls, ( 2 hours and a half for 40 >>moves, 1 hour for 20 moves, and all the moves for 30 minutes) . >> >>Fritz5.32 disapointed me totally, look the games, they all have good openings, >>and more than once Fritz lost in winning positions. Look carefuly at the games. >> >>Please look carefuly the game number 20, is one of the most beautiful game than >>i ever seen. Remember me the great JOSE RAUL CAPABLANCA. >> >>The results dont lie, Hiarcs7.32 is superior. My machine is k6-2 333 mhz with >>128 ram, 44 mb for each one. 150 minutes for 40 moves. >> > >It should come as no surprise that Hiarcs would win most of the games in these >engine vs. engine matches. First of all, at tournament time controls on your >machine, Fritz 5.32 would require 120 MB of RAM to function at full strength. >Moreover, Hiarcs retains its hash tables between moves in the engine vs. engine >matches, whereas Fritz starts from scratch on every move. This in essence gives >Hiarcs the equivalent of "pondering". > >I've noticed that in matches played on separate machines, these programs appear >to be fairly even, but only time will tell. ------ Hi Brett, Is there a way to get around this "Pondering" idea other than to have to play matches with two seperate CPU`S? ----- Terry
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.