Author: Dave Gomboc
Date: 10:20:21 10/26/99
Go up one level in this thread
On October 26, 1999 at 08:02:04, leonid wrote: >On October 26, 1999 at 04:57:07, Dave Gomboc wrote: > >>On October 25, 1999 at 10:33:44, leonid wrote: >> >>>On October 25, 1999 at 06:54:33, Georg v. Zimmermann wrote: >>> >>>>What is your native language please? >>>> >>>>What I was trying to say : >>>> >>>>Rebel is a chess-program >>>>Crafty is a chess-program >>>>Fritz is a chess-program >>>> >>>>they all play _one_ game (chess). >>>> >>>>Sorry, I really only wanted to help you with your English. Cause mine isn't that >>>>great either. >>>> >>>>--Tec >>> >>>Thanks! I feel that we all need this. My mother language is Russian. If >>>everybody and everywhere was so picky about hues and semantics I will be not in >>>this trouble on the first place. Problem is that "fixed depth" in chess jargon >>>don't go after clear logic. Logic says that this should signify fixed number of >>>plys no more, no less. Mistake! Since somebody indicated me this funny surprise >>>I never found my way around the problem. >>> >>>With my respect, >>>Leonid. >> >>"Fixed-depth" actually does mean "search to a fixed depth". If some program has >>an option that claims "fixed-depth" but isn't, they should call it something >>else. >> >>Dave > >But maybe you know how the "fixed depth" can be achieved and on what game. This >could help me to solve a puzzle. > >Comparing the speed when solving the mate was not problematic. Only you never >knows where you will face a surprise in chess programming. > >Leonid. Well, I doubt that any commercial is going to turn off its quiescence search. Your best bet is to take a crafty and hack it! Dave
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.