Author: Bertil Eklund
Date: 16:19:42 12/03/99
Go up one level in this thread
On December 03, 1999 at 13:37:58, José de Jesús García Ruvalcaba wrote: > Instead of giving code numbers to the secret entries, give them codenames! I >suggest using the names of famous masked wrestlers, like 'el Santo', 'Blue >Daemon', 'el Solitario', 'Lizmark', 'Canek', 'Atlantis', 'Mil Máscaras', >'Universo 2000', 'Pentagón', 'Pierrot', etc. > That way, you can publish the list with all the entries, without compromising >the secret nature of the programs, giving the readers a chance to compare their >progress from one list to the next. Also, the use of masked wrestlers names >seems fully appropiate, as their identity is also secret. >José. Hi! I have already suggested that. I´m tired of all this nonsense already and I suggest we should publish all results of all programs. If any company have any prevarications about our results let them prove why our results are misleading and let this forum judge who are right. We are still forbidden to publish results with Shredder4 but in my opinion it´s our duty to do so whatever mr Weiner says. An alternative should be that mr Faber(as suggested by himself(thanks!)) or someone else publish the results! He have tried all kinds of manmanouvers to make our list doubtful, but from now on I think he should deliver clear proofs for that. He or someone else also seems to have used torpedoes that tried to prove with statistics that our organisation is corrupt. In this forum it was a matematician who tried to prove that the SSDF was corrupted, I guess the same man tries to understand the world with statistics also. This man thought for instance that christmas was in october or november, but maybe he could prove it with statistics. Only my personal opinion Bertil
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.