Author: Harald Faber
Date: 07:48:58 04/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On April 09, 2000 at 21:56:22, robert blackwell wrote: >Well lads im not here for a fight. Its seems that it gets very ugly here when >someone states and opinion base on personally findings. I have played maybe 100 >games total between chess Tiger and Fritz. Tiger seems stronger.You all ask for >me to post, yet i bet you never even played over the games i posted. Game two is >a brilliant game, Tiger's ability to Activate its pieces is incredible. Also it >played themes of chess, not just try to open the position, and crash threw with >tactical shots. For instance the trapping of the knight on h4. What impressed me >is the fact tiger plays and understands the position, perhaps weak players cant >grasp this. Too bad! No one every questioned Enrique Irazoqui results. His games >showed tiger 100 elo pointa above the other programs!. Funny how we forget! I don't. I was the only or one of the few who did not follow the Tiger hype. I always wanted to SEE. Now I have seen. My opinion: Tiger is VERY strong, no doubt. As I wrote, in the same group with Shredder4, Junior6, probably Fritz6 and probably Hiarcs7.32 and Nimzo7.32, not to forget Rebel. But Tiger is NOT superior, neither a bit nor clearly.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.