Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 09:27:19 05/10/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 10, 2000 at 11:37:45, blass uri wrote: >Most of the results were close to 15:5 so when something is significantly >different it is natural to call it an unusual result and it is logical first to >check if there is a problem with the games with these results. We're talking about results at the same timecontrol. Results can diverge a lot when going from one timecontrol to another (check the Nunn tests at Chessfuns site). There were 2 test which gave the same 15-5 score and that isn't enough for a conclusion. There were _no_ proof that the 11-9 result was bogus. And if there were, what makes you assume that the 15-5 result is correct. There's no logic in your argumentation as far as I can tell. QED. Sincerely, Mogens
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.