Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Chessfun and Nunn1 Tests

Author: Mogens Larsen

Date: 15:20:44 05/11/00

Go up one level in this thread


On May 11, 2000 at 17:14:03, Chessfun wrote:

>Oh I see I have no idea....really.....Do you know the time control
>Jouni used?.

I have a pretty good idea about the timecontrol he used. Why?

>I do not believe learning is a problem with the blitz games.
>The autoplayer was a problem at first. But it must be remembered
>that these problems were my first experience with autoplayer....
>yet another variable for you.

You may be right about learning, but I doubt it. And experience with autoplayer
isn't a variable IMO, but not taking it into consideration is. Since you'll
probably rectify that, then there's no problem there either.

>Please post Jouni's text stating learning is off. On the same subject
>please explain to me how to turn off learning in F6.

I would like to, but there's a seven day limit for retrievement of previous
messages. Try mailing him. Regarding learning off with F6, I would suggest
reading the manual, since I don't own a copy of F6. You've mailed Chessbase
before, so why not try it again?

>F6 has no LRN file as Nimzo does. Note also Crafty 17-10 for Chessbase
>has no position.LRN file nor a *.rc file or any of the standard Crafty
>files and that all files associated with the eng still bear the original
>dates.

That I did understand and it does makes it somewhat difficult AFAICT.

>So please explain to me how to turn this off, since if Jouni posted it
>was off you must have asked him how....or is this another you took at
>face value like the taskinfo2000 producing same engine ponder in one machine.

Yes, you're right, I should have asked him about that too. Anything else?
Producing same engine ponder in one machine? I suggested that ponder on on one
machine could be tested with Taskinfo if anyone was interested. I mentioned it
in my mail to you and listed the link at CCC.

>I think you should re-think how you spend your time knitpicking but thats
>only an opinion.

Since I value your opinion, I will. No irony intended.

>Ok then since you consider these tests about the normal tourney? they are
>obviously not above the SSDF results. I saw no post from you on the issue
>of the SSDF posting while playing nor Junior 5 using Junior 6's book. Saw
>no post questioning their variables or even asking any question of their
>variables.

Unfortunately they are not as forthcoming with information as you are regarding
their tests. Therefore any questions on my part would be pure speculation and
answers unverifiable. I'm sure Blass Uri is more qualified than I regarding SSDF
matters. Please note that I didn't (at least to my recollection) complain about
you Easter Tourney, except maybe disappointment with the performance of SOS.

>As would I, but have no doubt I'm still checking.

Here are my e-mail adresses to help your search (and your filter):

mcl@mail1.stofanet.dk
mcl@private.dk
melvin_1955@hotmail.com
mogens72@yahoo.com

If you encounter any shenanighan's please let me know.

Sincerely,
Mogens



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.