Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 13:22:54 05/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2000 at 16:17:12, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 16, 2000 at 15:22:29, Pete Galati wrote: > >>I like the idea of being rated in that category though, the as Dann labels it >>"Total open" category. I don't see a reason for there not to be a rating, not >>unlike a correspondence or online rating, but instead a "Total open" rating, >>which I think might correspond to the human playing, but not a rating of the >>programs. >> >>Pete > >I guess it could be done, but then it could be something like: > >1. Deep Junior : 2600 >2. Fritz&Frans : 2577 >3. Crafty (Xeon): 2550 >4. The national Turkish rowing team: 2100 >5. Pete Galati and Amy on inferior hardware: 2050 >6. Scotsman on a horse: 1500 > >I don't if that's interesting, but I won't object to it. Unfortunately, the Frenchman was beaten by a fromage. It would be interesting to see if a team of humans can do better than a single human, or if a super GM with a computer will outdo a super GM without.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.