Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 13:17:12 05/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2000 at 15:22:29, Pete Galati wrote: >I like the idea of being rated in that category though, the as Dann labels it >"Total open" category. I don't see a reason for there not to be a rating, not >unlike a correspondence or online rating, but instead a "Total open" rating, >which I think might correspond to the human playing, but not a rating of the >programs. > >Pete I guess it could be done, but then it could be something like: 1. Deep Junior : 2600 2. Fritz&Frans : 2577 3. Crafty (Xeon): 2550 4. The national Turkish rowing team: 2100 5. Pete Galati and Amy on inferior hardware: 2050 6. Scotsman on a horse: 1500 I don't if that's interesting, but I won't object to it. Sincerely, Mogens
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.