Author: Pete Galati
Date: 12:22:29 05/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On May 16, 2000 at 14:42:49, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On May 16, 2000 at 14:17:28, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>Have three event categories: >>1. Humans only (FIDE, USCF, BCF, whatever) >>2. Machines only (ICCA) >>3. Total open (anything goes. A computer, a human, a human with a computer, a >>team of humans, whatever). > >That would still be possible according to the FIDE decision, since event >category no. 3 wouldn't be rated anyhow. I think that it is a good solution to >the problem. Similar to the thing I had in mind. Apples and oranges separated >except for exhibitional purposes, which isn't submitted to any rules whatsoever. > >Sincerely, >Mogens I like the idea of being rated in that category though, the as Dann labels it "Total open" category. I don't see a reason for there not to be a rating, not unlike a correspondence or online rating, but instead a "Total open" rating, which I think might correspond to the human playing, but not a rating of the programs. Pete
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.