Author: James Robertson
Date: 06:52:34 07/18/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 18, 2000 at 01:49:26, blass uri wrote: >On July 17, 2000 at 22:12:39, stuart taylor wrote: > > ><snipped> >>Computers spend much longer on a position when their evelution goes down as they go deeper. > >humans also spend more time when there are in trouble > ><snipped> >>That's why they make boring games. They defend against the opponents >>profoundest attacks, and don't bother making very profound attacks themselves, >>as once they find a reasonable move, they don't look further. >> They will never apply the dictum, "if you see a good move, don't play it, but >>look for something better". > >This is wrong. >computers always look for the best move. > ><snipped> >> Human are the opposite. They play to win, due to their very nature. They >>cannot spend their entire energy just on defence, and to avoid defeat. > >They can and khalifman is not the only player who did it succesfully against >Deep Junior to get a draw. > >Uri Yes, Bareev was amazing. I am still confused as to why Huebner resigned when he had excellent drawing chances, considering the way other humans were able to draw when more than a pawn down. James
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.