Author: Derrick Wilson
Date: 00:20:29 07/28/00
Go up one level in this thread
On July 28, 2000 at 01:16:36, Lanny DiBartolomeo wrote: >On July 28, 2000 at 00:58:14, Jouni Uski wrote: > >>I made comparison between Carson's latest human list and SSDF to clear >>possible level difference. But it's very difficult, when there are not many >>exactly same software and hardware combinations. I removed multiprosessor >>results and made assumption, that difference between 200MMX and 450 Mhz is 79p >>(for comp-comp, sure not for human-comp). Here's some figures: >> >> Program average speed Against humans SSDF rating difference >> >> Rebel 431Mhz 2549/33 games 2594 (200MMX+79p) -45 >> Fritz6 500Mhz 2457/15 2721 (450) -264 >> Hiarcs6 272Mhz 2573/20 2518 (200MMX) +55 >> Shredder 500Mhz 2495/8 2676 (450) -181 >> CM5/6K 375Mhz 2521/14 2653 (200MMX+79p) -132 >> >>This means, that average difference (Against human - SSDF rating) is -85p. >>(Weighted difference for all 90 games). >> >>I think this confirms general feeling, that SSDF must drop level by 100 points. >>Counting these multiprosessor Junior/Fritz may still lower level. >> >>I this this kind of list is much more reasonable than current: >> >> 1 Fritz 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2621 >> 2 Junior 6.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2589 >> 3 Chess Tiger 12.0 DOS 128MB K6-2 450 2571 >> 4 Fritz 5.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2554 >> 5 Nimzo 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2553 >> 6 Junior 5.0 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2526 >> 6 Hiarcs 7.32 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2526 >> 8 Crafty 17.07/CB 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2524 >> 9 Nimzo 99 128MB K6-2 450 MHz 2523 >> 10 Hiarcs 7.32 64MB P200 MMX 2477 >> 11 Fritz 5.32 64MB P200 MMX 2475 >> 12 Chessmaster 6000 64MB P200 MMX 2474 >> 13 Hiarcs 7.0 64MB P200 MMX 2460 >> 13 Fritz 5.0 PB29% 67MB P200 MMX 2460 >> 15 Nimzo 99 64MB P200 MMX 2449 >> 16 Junior 5.0 64MB P200 MMX 2437 >> 17 Nimzo 98 58MB P200 MMX 2425 >> 18 Rebel 9.0 47MB P200 MMX 2420 >> 19 Hiarcs 6.0 49MB P200 MMX 2418 >> 20 Rebel 8.0 51MB P200 MMX 2410 >> >>Jouni > >Yes, but if you leave Fritz6 on top it is too inflated compared to human games, > and dropping hiarcs rating would be a problem as well since it earned its >rating 2573, it seems like the damage is done and you need a separate ratings >list for comps vs human. I do not think you can just lower the ratings straight >across the board. > Lanny What evidence do you have that Fritz6 rating would be inflated? I hope your not going by the few games played at the israeli league?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.