Author: Uri Blass
Date: 14:15:56 09/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 05, 2000 at 16:52:18, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On September 05, 2000 at 15:50:53, Uri Blass wrote: > >>I do not think that you are right. >>Most people will say that getting the program that you test is not sufficient. > >No, I disagree, I have faith in the integrity of people in general. I do not see why do you think that refusing to test programs only for getting the program is something immoral(If I understand you correctly). > >>I believe that I have some productive ideas for chess program that I did not >>discover and chess programs do not use. > >Well, if you didn't discover them then it's even less morally correct , or do you >mean that you discovered that the ideas weren't being used? I mean that: 1)I thought about some ideas. 2)I discovered that the ideas are not used by chess programs. 3)I told nobody about the ideas. I do not see something immoral in what I did. No matter what, I >wouldn't pay you a dime if I was a programmer. But that's just me, some may have >a different opinion. Nobody paid me for being a beta tester but Ed paid me for operating Rebel Century in the Israeli league and I earned more money relative to the price of chess programs from this job. Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.