Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 13:24:13 09/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2000 at 15:57:00, Dieter Buerssner wrote: >Mogens, the result you sent to me really is almost the only result, where Yace >is doing coniderably worse with null_low 4. One other result from myself was >against The Crazy Bishop at fast time controls, where it was worse. I got sent >quite many test results against very strong engines with Game in 30 minutes. >null_l 4 seemed to significantly better. In the boring tests Yace - Yace at >different time controls, null_low 4 allways was better. Against Crafty at >different time controls null_low 4 allways seemed to be better. I am still >puzzled. I've run a few smaller tests since then and I haven't managed to see an improvement with null_low 4 at any point. But I don't mind trying again against a strong engine, though I'm not sure which one to choose. Maybe LG2000 v2.9a or the older "d" version of Gandalf. Suggestions about opponent and timecontrol are welcome. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.