Author: Chessfun
Date: 13:55:12 09/22/00
Go up one level in this thread
On September 22, 2000 at 16:24:13, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On September 22, 2000 at 15:57:00, Dieter Buerssner wrote: > >>Mogens, the result you sent to me really is almost the only result, where Yace >>is doing coniderably worse with null_low 4. One other result from myself was >>against The Crazy Bishop at fast time controls, where it was worse. I got sent >>quite many test results against very strong engines with Game in 30 minutes. >>null_l 4 seemed to significantly better. In the boring tests Yace - Yace at >>different time controls, null_low 4 allways was better. Against Crafty at >>different time controls null_low 4 allways seemed to be better. I am still >>puzzled. > >I've run a few smaller tests since then and I haven't managed to see an >improvement with null_low 4 at any point. But I don't mind trying again against >a strong engine, though I'm not sure which one to choose. Maybe LG2000 v2.9a or >the older "d" version of Gandalf. Suggestions about opponent and timecontrol are >welcome. I recently found LG2000 v2.9a a bit of a ?. Blackdemon at chessnet claims to use this on a PII 233 processor and my record with Yace against him is not good, something like lose 50% more than win. Though then I ran 50 blitz games at home and found Yace won as I recall by 5 or 6. LG2000 v2.9a is I think a good choice. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.