Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Differentiate all time (contemporary greats versus influential greats)

Author: Christophe Theron

Date: 22:43:48 11/05/00

Go up one level in this thread


On November 05, 2000 at 15:33:57, Jonathan Lee wrote:

>I understand Walter Irvin's point of view of contemporary greats versus
>the others point of view who are talking about influential greats.
>It would be safe to say that the 20th century influential greats (such as
>Richard Lang) are a SUBSET of the year 2000 contemporary greats listed _some_ by
>Walter Irvin.
>Grandmasters in gigahertz:  Just tell me how many gigahertz will it take to
>equal Kramnik.
>Jonathan (83rd message)



500MHz will be enough. Not with current programs, but in several years software
improvements will compensate.



    Christophe



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.