Author: Uri Blass
Date: 11:28:29 03/29/01
Go up one level in this thread
On March 29, 2001 at 12:30:23, Ralf Elvsén wrote:
>On March 29, 2001 at 12:22:35, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On March 29, 2001 at 12:18:26, Ralf Elvsén wrote:
>>
>>>On March 29, 2001 at 11:27:23, Hans Christian Lykke wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>32... g5 {-0.78/17 7200} 33. f5 {-1.19/16 120:00m} *
>>>>
>>>>[D] rnbqkbnr/pppppppp/8/8/8/8/PPPPPPPP/RNBQKBNR w KQkq - 0 1
>>>>
>>>>Shredder played the move expected by Deep Fritz: 33.f5
>>>>Shredders evaluation dropped from -0.48/16 to -1.19/16 ?!
>>>>
>>>>Shredder now expecting 33...Rxf5 34. Re3
>>>>
>>>>Next move by Deep Fritz on Friday
>>>>
>>>>Venlig hilsen
>>>>Hans Christian Lykke
>>>
>>>In this situation I wonder: are you keeping a strict 2h/move? Or do you
>>>let Shredder look at all moves at the depth?
>>>
>>>If you terminate the search after exactly 2h and don't let shredder finish
>>>an iteration I think this game isn't particularly interesting. This is
>>>not even close to how a program would allocate time in a real game.
>>
>>This is not close to how a program allocate time in a real game but it does not
>>do the game not interesting.
>>
>>In a real game programs never have 2 hours per move so the level in this game
>>should be higher than the level in a real game.
>>
>>Uri
>
>See my reply to Bertil below. The program might know it is losing
>but is forced to play the move anyway. Not the kind of rules I like.
>
>Ralf
In tournament time control it may play the same move because it even has not
enough time to know that it is losing so it does not change the fact that the
level of game is higher than tournament time control.
You can also ask the same question about a regular tournament game.
If you see at move 40 that you are losing and you have only few seconds to the
time control.
I will prefer to play a move that I have not enough time to analyze in this case
Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.