Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 13:07:19 03/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
On March 26, 1998 at 03:00:46, Scott Carmichael wrote: > One cannot overestimate the need for solid proof before slandering >another person. Really ?! Maybe you are a materialist. And you need proof for anything. I can live pretty good without proving anything in my life. Also I can pretty well live and talk without SOLID PROOF in my life. I hope your life is not that dried. It sound as if... :-) > You are speaking along the lines of allowing bias to >rule in place of correct judgement, and that is definitely one thing >that this current debate does not need. Pah ! I find it very funny that beside the BIG DISCUSSION ABOUT HOW FRITZ HAS DONE IT we suddenly hear, en passant , about another tournament where Fritz played with special again SO CALLED POWER-BOOKs ! I find it funny. Maybe this is not SOLID enough for you to spent a smile on it, but my friend and myself had a lot of fun reading this in Karstens article. >Only data based on actual, >existing evidence should be comsidered, and your suggesting otherwise is >laughable, even to a novice such as myself. So - you laugh too. What the hell is the problem than ? If we all laugh, anything is ok, isn't it ? :-)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.