Author: Scott Carmichael
Date: 17:18:08 03/26/98
Go up one level in this thread
A materialist ? Certainly, I want material proof of these things before I deride a program, or its publisher/developer/programmer. How about believing in the fact that a person is innocent until proven guilty? The more you write here, the more you show yourself to be involved in this matter simply to hunt witches, not to establish anything useful. And it is becoming more and more obvious that the problem isn't which book Fritz is using, but rather who can type the most incessant drivel without having to show solid proof. Debate and disccussion are wonderous creations of the human mind, but they still rely on proof to be effective, which is, quite honestly, the reason your comments in this matter are moot. In the end, the ultimate proof will come as a score at the end of a game played on even terms, and you can bet on that with your friends. SMILE, it's only the real world that will pass you by. But don't fret, for I have certainly gotten a laugh from your rebuttal.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.