Author: David Rasmussen
Date: 10:05:48 05/21/01
Go up one level in this thread
On May 21, 2001 at 07:04:55, Pete Galati wrote: >On May 21, 2001 at 02:56:10, David Rasmussen wrote: > >>I don't understand why xboard/winboard doesn't support books on it's own. If it >>did, no one would have to implement opening book in their engines unless they >>wanted book learning and such. And even that could be supported by xb/wb. Even >>if people didn't want to use this feature, they could just turn it off. >>Many people are reinventing opening book features all the time. And it really >>isn't as exciting as developing search or evaluation etc. > >That's not the nature of Xboard/Winboard. The opening book is the Chess >program's problem, not Xboard/Winboard's problem. They're just there to give >you an interface to the Chess program. > I know, but opening book support is so boringly simple, that it might as well be the interface that does it. It is very boring to implement opening book in a chess engine (at least for me), still, it can be done in really bad and really good ways. Why not let the engine handle this? It would make any winboard program, such as TSCP, have powerful openbook capabilities at hand. >Besides, most of the programers won't want Tim Mann to be the one making the >opening books for their programs, and my guess is that Tim Mann probably isn't >interested in doing that either. > Why would Tim Mann be doing it? If this is to be done in any kind of sane way, users, programmers etc. should be able to build their own books, control learning features etc. from the engine.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.