Author: Wayne Lowrance
Date: 07:52:29 07/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On July 12, 2001 at 04:31:57, Jonas Cohonas wrote: >On July 12, 2001 at 01:41:45, Wayne Lowrance wrote: > >>On July 11, 2001 at 21:30:36, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On July 11, 2001 at 20:12:56, K. Burcham wrote: >>> >>>>you could have used f--- instead of what you did john. >>>> >>>>there could be some young ones here, and maybe some that just object. >>>> >>>>is this acceptable language here? >>>> >>>>i think not. >>>> >>>>arent there some women that post here also? >>>> >>>>yes we should treat them equal, but i feel uncomfortable about this post. >>> >>> >>> >>>As long as "fuck" is not used to insult the reader of the message, nor used to >>>shock the reader on purpose, I don't see where the problem is... >>> >>>Or maybe you just hope that by removing the word "fuck" from everywhere the >>>youngest one will never understand what "fuck" means, or will understand only >>>when it is legal for them to understand the word? :) >>> >>>I consider "f---" as offensive than "fuck". Not because of the meaning of the >>>word. It's because of the censorship applied on it. It is much more subversive >>>and damaging than the real meaning of the word. >>> >>> >>> >>> Christophe >> >>I just do not agree with you. That language has no place here. There are women >>here for example and it makes no difference how it is said, it does not need to >>be said. My opinion anyhow >>WAyne > >What difference does it make that there are women here? what a bad argument, >either you are fine with the use of the word or you are not, someone pointed out >that there are younger readers/posters here and that is why i don't think that >using profanity is ok, even if it is a quote, i mean where is the limit? > >Regards >Jonas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.