Author: Slater Wold
Date: 17:37:43 09/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2001 at 19:59:46, Uri Blass wrote: >On September 09, 2001 at 19:44:59, Slater Wold wrote: > >>On September 09, 2001 at 19:26:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >> >>>On September 09, 2001 at 16:18:36, K. Burcham wrote: >>> >>>>game 2 deep blue moves >>>> >>>>26. f4 >>>>37. Be4 >>> >>>Be4 is a bad move. 37.Qb6 is winning there because it goes to a won >>>opposite bishops endgame (if you toss pieces with black) which directly >>>explains why some programs want to make this move. >> >>Anand seems to disagree with you. You can disagree with me all you want, but I >>think an arguement on the best chess move against Anand is going to be a short >>one. > >I know that I cannot trust analysis of GM's not because they are stupid but >because they usually do not spend a lot of time about their analysis and often >do not use computers to investigate if they are right or wrong. > >It is a fact that Peter leko is not very good in correspondence games based on >his ICCF rating and I believe that the main reason is simply the fact that >average players who waste a lot of time about their games are simply better than >super GM's who do not waste time about their corresondence games. > >Uri LOL - Geez. No matter what I say............ Someone here always has a reason why Deep Blue was wrong when Deep Fritz cannot find its move.....even when one of the top 3 GM's in the world agrees it's the best move, you still have a reason why it's not. Look at the commentary for the moves. All GM's (and even Kaspy himself) who were at the game (and/or watching it) all agree Be4 is the move to make. Slate
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.