Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: do you know of any other deep blue moves that i can test

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 16:59:46 09/09/01

Go up one level in this thread


On September 09, 2001 at 19:44:59, Slater Wold wrote:

>On September 09, 2001 at 19:26:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On September 09, 2001 at 16:18:36, K. Burcham wrote:
>>
>>>game 2  deep blue moves
>>>
>>>26. f4
>>>37. Be4
>>
>>Be4 is a bad move. 37.Qb6 is winning there because it goes to a won
>>opposite bishops endgame (if you toss pieces with black) which directly
>>explains why some programs want to make this move.
>
>Anand seems to disagree with you.  You can disagree with me all you want, but I
>think an arguement on the best chess move against Anand is going to be a short
>one.

I know that I cannot trust analysis of GM's not because they are stupid but
because they usually do not spend a lot of time about their analysis and often
do not use computers to investigate if they are right or wrong.

It is a fact that Peter leko is not very good in correspondence games based on
his ICCF rating and I believe that the main reason is simply the fact that
average players who waste a lot of time about their games are simply better than
super GM's who do not waste time about their corresondence games.

Uri



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.