Author: Slater Wold
Date: 16:44:59 09/09/01
Go up one level in this thread
On September 09, 2001 at 19:26:03, Vincent Diepeveen wrote: >On September 09, 2001 at 16:18:36, K. Burcham wrote: > >>game 2 deep blue moves >> >>26. f4 >>37. Be4 > >Be4 is a bad move. 37.Qb6 is winning there because it goes to a won >opposite bishops endgame (if you toss pieces with black) which directly >explains why some programs want to make this move. Anand seems to disagree with you. You can disagree with me all you want, but I think an arguement on the best chess move against Anand is going to be a short one. > >Just tune higher in crafty for example opposite bishops, recompile and you'll >see. > >Diep 1997 wanted to play Be4 too up to 10 plies. from 11 ply and further >it preferred the better Qb6. Nowadays version has better opposite bishop >code and prefers Qb6 pretty soon. > >There is only one shot in the deep blue - kasparov games (there are >many in the log files visible though) and that's >in game 6 where DB played Bf5! winning a queen. > >IN contradiction to what some non-analyzing dudes post here, nearly >all programs play that move after seeing the same tactical line. > >Deep Blue plays it at 8(6). > >> >>so far both of these moves have been found by two or more of todays >>programs, in very short time. i can post more eval of both positions, if >>requested. deep fritz does not choose these moves. my point was that >>if deep fritz was able to choose these moves with a change in parameters, >>then i would have to assume it would be capable to play these two moves >>if the overall strength was not decreased from the change. >> >>junior7 >>shredder5 >>gandalf >>goliath light >>gambit tiger finds f4 not Be4 >>these are just some that find these moves. >> >>conclusion: these two moves can be found by todays programs. >> >>kburcham
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.