Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 10:32:25 10/12/01
Go up one level in this thread
On October 12, 2001 at 11:24:03, Daniel Clausen wrote: >Hi > >On October 12, 2001 at 10:23:07, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >[snip] > >>First try the Nolot test positions for 36 hours. Then report back with >>your "finding". :) > >And where exactly is the proof that the so-called solutions of these tests >really are the best? Or is it more like opening theory where the so-called >book moves just happen to be considered best/good by a large number of >people, whereas it's possible that white to move is lost from the beginning >(due to ZugZwang ;) and the best defense is a3? (maybe followed by h6! hee) > >Sargon Some of them are provably correct (almost all in fact). But they take far longer than 36 hours. If you really think 36 hours will solve _any_ problem, then you must think that computers are unbeatable at correspondence chess? They are _far_ from it in fact...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.