Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 05:10:12 11/08/01
Go up one level in this thread
On November 08, 2001 at 08:01:39, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>On November 08, 2001 at 07:40:57, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>
>>On November 08, 2001 at 06:35:18, Jonas Cohonas wrote:
>>
>>Sure if there is a prize fund i'll join.
>>
>>I usually go for the draw. then the thing wants to win, and i
>>finish it. i need to know the name of my opponent of course,
>>otherwise it's not fair.
>>
>>>Can anyone here beat the "best" prog in 40/120 without using anti comp
>>>strtegies? on atleast an Athlon 1000?
>>>
>>>I have seen a lot of post where people draw the comps when trying to do nothing
>>>but that, but i am yet to see someone not using anti comp strategies beat them
>>>in a 40/120 on fast hardware..... anyone up for the challenge?
>>>
>>>Regards
>>>Jonas
>
>The prize would be the reward of beating a prog under these conditions:
>No anti comp play, 40/120 on fast hardware.
>
>Regards
>Jonas
First define anti computer play. i play awfully passive usually.
i usually get closed positions and i hope my opponent fakes out and
panics and exchanges my bad bishop for his active knight.
that's not anti-computer play right?
I'm 2312 and FM. So it's kind of unfair to say: 'you must play a tactical
game against the computer'.
Let me show you a game i played on USCL where i won from
crafty. Is this anti-computer play?
Because if you decide it's not, then any way of fighting the machine
is allowed of course.
Of course i prefer to take it out of book at move 3 or so. I'm not going
to fight an opponent with mainlines. I never do!
Auch no search command at uscl. duh.
let me seek in my email box. here it is:
MiChiDa (2471) vs. Diepeveen (2339) --- Wed Oct 17, 08:55 EDT 2001
Rated standard match, initial time: 15 minutes, increment: 15 seconds.
Move MiChiDa Diepeveen
---- --------------------- ---------------------
1. Na3 (0:00.000) e5 (0:00.000)
2. c4 (0:00.020) c5 (0:18.750)
3. e4 (1:00.014) Nc6 (0:05.047)
4. d3 (0:43.225) Bd6 (0:07.812)
5. Nf3 (0:40.541) Nge7 (0:05.828)
6. Nb5 (0:56.346) Bc7 (0:02.640)
7. Bd2 (0:35.324) a6 (0:10.297)
8. Nxc7+ (0:37.988) Qxc7 (0:02.891)
9. Be2 (0:33.356) O-O (0:03.719)
10. O-O (0:33.453) d6 (0:09.140)
11. h3 (0:27.299) b5 (0:29.969)
12. cxb5 (0:37.433) axb5 (0:02.406)
13. Qc2 (0:31.948) b4 (0:07.828)
14. a4 (0:12.717) h6 (3:16.703)
15. b3 (0:35.537) Be6 (0:05.796)
16. Rfb1 (0:36.684) f5 (0:04.843)
17. Rb2 (0:33.950) f4 (0:26.313)
18. Re1 (0:35.555) Qd7 (0:06.704)
19. Rbb1 (0:32.430) Kh8 (0:46.828)
20. Bd1 (0:33.157) g5 (0:03.860)
21. Rf1 (0:11.823) Rf6 (1:38.594)
22. Nh2 (0:31.984) Nd4 (0:03.516)
23. Qa2 (0:27.016) f3 (0:07.828)
24. Nxf3 (0:31.451) Nxf3+ (0:36.844)
25. Bxf3 (0:00.897) Rxf3 (0:18.719)
26. gxf3 (0:30.771) Ng6 (0:15.203)
27. f4 (0:55.107) Bxh3 (0:21.359)
28. f5 (0:00.995) Nf4 (0:34.688)
29. Rfd1 (0:29.329) Qf7 (0:33.828)
30. f3 (1:46.091) Qh5 (0:18.687)
31. Bxf4 (0:40.128) gxf4 (0:04.359)
32. Kf2 (0:06.505) Bg2 (1:16.469)
33. Ke1 (0:00.990) Bxf3 (0:10.703)
34. Qf2 (0:00.975) Rg8 (0:16.594)
35. Kd2 (0:00.630) Rg2 (0:02.906)
36. Qxg2 (0:14.608) Bxg2 (0:08.734)
37. Kc2 (0:04.144) f3 (0:01.328)
38. Rd2 (0:10.895) Qh4 (0:45.953)
39. a5 (0:29.094) f2 (0:45.813)
40. a6 (0:28.108) f1=Q (0:05.485)
41. Rxf1 (0:20.223) Bxf1 (0:01.688)
42. a7 (0:07.853) Qd8 (0:01.734)
43. Rh2 (0:09.275) Qa8 (0:59.906)
44. Rxh6+ (0:27.769) Kg7 (0:02.750)
45. Rg6+ (1:03.956) Kh7 (0:02.078)
46. Rg1 (0:33.690) Qxa7 (0:02.359)
47. Rxf1 (0:25.220) Qa2+ (0:02.562)
48. Kd1 (0:01.607) Qxb3+ (0:02.016)
49. Ke2 (0:01.733) Kg7 (0:06.750)
50. Rg1+ (0:11.371) Kf7 (0:04.563)
51. Rh1 (0:02.393) Qb2+ (0:07.937)
52. Ke3 (0:02.656) Qd4+ (0:01.391)
53. Ke2 (0:21.230) c4 (0:01.266)
54. Rh7+ (0:28.447) Kg8 (0:01.875)
55. Rh3 (0:10.164) cxd3+ (0:01.531)
{White resigned} 0-1
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.