Author: Sandro Necchi
Date: 14:27:58 05/24/02
Go up one level in this thread
On May 24, 2002 at 16:12:25, pavel wrote:
>On May 24, 2002 at 15:39:27, Sandro Necchi wrote:
>
>>On May 24, 2002 at 13:34:17, Kurt Utzinger wrote:
>>
>>Dear Kurt,
>>
>>it is true that he did not play enough games, but I did and I told that the
>>Classic version is stronger.
>>
>>"UNFORTUNATELY SSDF FINDS TIME TO TEST SEVERAL TIGER VERSION AND NOT THE WC
>>PROGRAM-:((("
>>
>>I sincerely did not understood this yet.
>>
>>Recently they stated that it is not clear which book is better, but they only
>>tested the classic with the slower K2-450.
>>
>>This to me SOUND ONLY AS AN EXCUSE...
>>
>>Sorry to criticize SSDF, but I cannot lie or tell what I do not think.
>>
>>SSDF can you hear me?
>>
>>Ciao
>>Sandro
>>
>>
>
>
>Hey Sandro,
> According to Stephan Shredder7 (which will come later this year) will
>be reasonably stronger over Shredder6, are you testing it?
Of course, but the final version is not ready yet. We are still working on it.
>If so, whats your first impression?
Well, you will see the difference in a few games...
Do you understand what I mean?
Maybe this time we'll be lucky to see it tested in due time by SSDF:-))
>
>regards
>pavs
Regards
Sandro
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.