Author: Kim Hvarre
Date: 06:05:59 08/05/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 1998 at 07:41:47, Freddie wrote: >Shaun, > >I was surprised by a previous posting where you said that Chessmaster 5500 would >beat Fritz 5 or Rebel 9 on a Pentium II 400 computer. Aren't the latter two >programs supposed to be superior in both knowledge and search speed? I would >appreciate it if you or someone else could explain how and why this would be >possible. > >Regards, >Freddie. It is'nt - quote SSDF (uh...): snip 10 Rebel 9.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2448 29 -29 572 52% 2436 12 Rebel 8.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2447 20 -20 1193 58% 2388 13 Hiarcs 5.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2432 39 -38 343 61% 2355 14 Genius 5.0 DOS Pentium 90 MHz 2428 22 -22 1044 53% 2410 15 MChess Pro 6.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2421 20 -20 1230 52% 2409 16 Genius 3.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2407 27 -26 719 62% 2320 16 MChess Pro 5.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2407 26 -25 759 62% 2318 18 Genius 4.0 DOS Pentium 90 MHz 2406 24 -24 877 61% 2328 19 Rebel 7.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2403 26 -25 749 61% 2322 20 Junior 4.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2395 26 -27 692 46% 2420 21 Hiarcs 4.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2394 25 -25 766 55% 2359 22 Shredder 1.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2388 59 -58 145 53% 2369 *23 Chessmaster 5000 Pentium 90 MHz 2387 49 -45 240 67% 2262* same engine as CM5500!! regards, kim
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.