Author: blass uri
Date: 06:22:40 08/05/98
Go up one level in this thread
On August 05, 1998 at 09:05:59, Kim Hvarre wrote: >On August 05, 1998 at 07:41:47, Freddie wrote: > >>Shaun, >> >>I was surprised by a previous posting where you said that Chessmaster 5500 would >>beat Fritz 5 or Rebel 9 on a Pentium II 400 computer. Aren't the latter two >>programs supposed to be superior in both knowledge and search speed? I would >>appreciate it if you or someone else could explain how and why this would be >>possible. >> >>Regards, >>Freddie. > >It is'nt - quote SSDF (uh...): > >snip >10 Rebel 9.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2448 29 -29 572 52% 2436 > >12 Rebel 8.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2447 20 -20 1193 58% 2388 > >13 Hiarcs 5.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2432 39 -38 343 61% 2355 > >14 Genius 5.0 DOS Pentium 90 MHz 2428 22 -22 1044 53% 2410 > >15 MChess Pro 6.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2421 20 -20 1230 52% 2409 > >16 Genius 3.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2407 27 -26 719 62% 2320 > >16 MChess Pro 5.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2407 26 -25 759 62% 2318 > >18 Genius 4.0 DOS Pentium 90 MHz 2406 24 -24 877 61% 2328 > >19 Rebel 7.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2403 26 -25 749 61% 2322 > >20 Junior 4.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2395 26 -27 692 46% 2420 > >21 Hiarcs 4.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2394 25 -25 766 55% 2359 > >22 Shredder 1.0 Pentium 90 MHz 2388 59 -58 145 53% 2369 > >*23 Chessmaster 5000 Pentium 90 MHz 2387 49 -45 240 67% 2262* same >engine as CM5500!! If it is the same engine then what is the difference? regards Uri > >regards, >kim
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.