Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: impact of early queen exchange on performance

Author: Mike S.

Date: 12:36:13 10/09/02

Go up one level in this thread


On October 09, 2002 at 14:23:03, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>(...)
>I've given some examples of things I've had to fix after watching GMs pick on
>the same hole
>over and over.  Today I don't see those huge holes cause me a lot of trouble
>(yes I still have
>holes, to be sure, but not the building-sized holes some "tactical" programs
>possess..) and I
>don't particularly care if queens come off early or not. (...)

I've added Crafty 18.x results from the same database:

Percentages, based on a large comp-comp database:

Engine          | #Games   total  W    B  | total eQE* W/eQE   B/eQE
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Fritz 7         |  784      69%  72%  65% | 59% (#57)   53%     67%
Chess Tiger 14  |  850      66%  71%  62% | 72% (#71)   73%     71%
Shredder 6/-P.  |  743      61%  65%  57% | 58% (#58)   63%     53%
Junior 7        |  799      55%  58%  53% | 41% (#60)   25% !   56%
Crafty 18.x     |  741      48%  48%  47% | 51% (#52)   51%     52%

*) "eQE" = early queen exchange (within the first 10 moves)

This illustrates precisely what you wrote. The eQE obviously is no threat at all
for Crafty :o). The percentages are a bit higher even, similar to Tiger's, which
indicates the good endgame strength (of both).

(Btw. the games were against a bandwith of engines including i.e. various other
top engines and freeware, not only the ones mentioned.)

I think the strength of Fritz in tactics / king attack could compensate for the
lesser good endgame strength, if only Kramnik would not be able to exchange
queens during the book variants already, always. But I don't know if an opening
book could be built, which strictly avoids variants with early queen exchanges.
Maybe for the next match :o).

For engines playing Black, an anti-fritz (and anti-junior) book which favours
variants with queen exchanges would also be interesting IMO. I didn't find a way
to generate such a book automatically (probably impossible "the easy way",
because the exchanges are not directly related with the results, and also such a
book must not have big holes in other "non-exchange" variants...)

Regards
M.Scheidl



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.