Author: Andreas Herrmann
Date: 16:53:46 12/19/02
Go up one level in this thread
On December 19, 2002 at 19:21:04, Uri Blass wrote: >On December 19, 2002 at 18:49:56, Dann Corbit wrote: > >>On December 19, 2002 at 18:47:22, Joshua Haglund wrote: >> >>>Anyone know of a good site(s) for the programming of a (legal) move generator? >> >>You'll find a lot more help looking for a pseudo-legal move generator. I don't >>think anyone makes a strictly legal move generator (maybe Uri does...) > >I did it and chest also did it and I remember that other programmers also did >it(Miguel started with legal move generator and I remember that peter makanzi >also does it(or at least did it in the past)). > >pseudo legal move generator is the easy way but I do not think that it is better >and the fact that chest is the best mate solver suggest that legal move >generator may be better. > >Uri Hi Uri, but a pseudo legal move generator is faster. You have to check if the king is in check only if you must evaluate a position. What is the advantage of a slower legal move generator? Andreas
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.