Author: John Coffey
Date: 14:00:28 09/28/98
Go up one level in this thread
Again: >but "everywhere" doesn't mean when you are down in material or the >material is even? it only means when material has been *gained*? It would not make sense to me to skip a move for one side if that one side has lost material. But everytime I ask the question, "do we do a null move check *******************only*************** (note the emphasis :-) when a side is ahead in material?", I am told repeatedly that the null move check is done **************everywhere************. Which would seem to contradict my question. If so, why? If one side drops a rook, are we going to let the other side make two moves in a row to do a null move check? John Coffey
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.