Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: SSDF Rating List Less Chessmaster? Why?

Author: Mike S.

Date: 10:36:59 10/20/03

Go up one level in this thread


On October 20, 2003 at 09:23:50, James T. Walker wrote:

>(...) A few
>games would mean nothing for a reliable rating.  You need hundreds.  The
>Chessmaster played on the servers is NOT Chessmaster 9000.  It is "TheKing"
>engine and some other book.  Sometimes it's a modified engine which plays very
>different from the original.  It is usually played in a Chessbase GUI where
>auto232 is also available.  To have credibility the games also have to be
>controlled in some manner.  The hardware needs to be consistent and verified.
>Doing this on the internet without the ChessMasters own book is not interesting
>to me.

The problem of running The King in the Fritz GUI (and in other Auto232 capable
GUIs, like Shredder classic and Arena) has been solved since ages! So, using the
King engine and Auto232 is possible. I'm sure SSDF ist aware of this. The Wb2Uci
topic is well known; lots of people use it constantly. So, the original book is
the only problem, but for that I think a good "neutral" CTG book could be
created from IM/GM games, to be used in these test runs.

A little compromise - much better that not to test it at all...

http://www.talkchess.com/forums/1/message.html?322394
(about recommandable settings etc., as the defaults would be nonsens to test)

Blown in the wind. :-)

Regards,
M.Scheidl



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.