Author: Drexel,Michael
Date: 03:40:13 11/17/03
Go up one level in this thread
On November 17, 2003 at 06:33:39, Francesco Di Tolla wrote: >On November 16, 2003 at 19:23:14, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 16, 2003 at 19:12:42, rait wrote: >> >>>got wrong-wery closed (not suiteble) opening variation and then had no good >>>strategy if any... >> >>I will ask the question in a different way. >> >>What is the move that changed the theoretical result of the game from draw to >>win for kasparov? >> >>I think that the answer is going to be we do not know because unfortunately or >>firtunately we did not solve chess. > >I think the first error was 9...Qc7, it is probaly necessary to "concede" >something and take in b5 (I admit I havent checked if there is any tactics that >prevent cxb5). 9...cxb5 is just awful and completely losing. Michael > >But a more severe error is 14...Bd6 this wastes a lot of time. I would go for >14...g6 followed by Nh5 anf f5 or for 14...Ne8 followed by f5. > >Many of the moves from 15 on show the lack of a plan. A tragic wait and see >approach. >E.g. 22...Nf6 was again bad and f5 a possible alternative. Still I feel black is >already lost here. > >White important moves are silent moves: 13.h3 takes the g4 square away from any >attempt of Ng4-f5. >Further 18.Rb2 to overprotect f2 as suggested on ChessBase site. I don't know if >this induces fritz to dislike f5, but if this is the case then poor fritz! > >regards >franz
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.