Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: No ! Fischer is (nt)

Author: Bas Hamstra

Date: 08:39:20 11/18/03

Go up one level in this thread

On November 18, 2003 at 10:51:44, Tony Werten wrote:

>Couldn't resist.
>
>Tony

Actually, in Leiden you said SEE costs you only a table lookup. My question is:
what about x-rays? It seems impossible to me to get the *real* see value with a
table lookup in practice. So how do you do it?

Toedeledokie,
Bas.

• Re: No ! Fischer is (nt) Tony Werten 00:12:35 11/19/03
  • Re: No ! Fischer is (nt) Bas Hamstra 09:09:46 11/19/03
    • Re: No ! Fischer is (nt) Tony Werten 11:22:49 11/19/03
  • Attack tables and table-based SEE Tord Romstad 05:33:58 11/19/03
    • Re: Attack tables and table-based SEE Tony Werten 01:14:58 11/20/03
      • Re: Attack tables and table-based SEE Tord Romstad 11:39:58 11/20/03
• Re: No ! Fischer is (nt) Dann Corbit 12:27:22 11/18/03
  • Re: No ! Fischer is (nt) Tord Romstad 12:47:39 11/18/03
    • Re: No ! Fischer is (nt) Dann Corbit 13:26:23 11/18/03
• Table-based SEE Tord Romstad 11:44:23 11/18/03
  • Re: Table-based SEE Anthony Cozzie 09:16:52 11/19/03
    • Re: Table-based SEE Tord Romstad 11:27:59 11/19/03
      • Re: Table-based SEE Anthony Cozzie 04:55:21 11/20/03
• Re: No ! Fischer is (nt) Steve Maughan 11:37:07 11/18/03

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.