Author: Uri Blass
Date: 05:24:17 02/21/04
Go up one level in this thread
On February 20, 2004 at 23:14:22, Arturo Ochoa wrote:
>>I'll try one last time to lay this out for you.
>>
>
>I dont need that you lay anything for me. You have been very arrogant and
>egocentric. I dont need to explain you anything again when every message yours
>is a real provocation. You should not be treating the people as garbage because
>your contribution to the chess computer are is unknown for everybody.
>
>
>>First off, this has NOTHING to do with Hydra at all, or Venezuela, or any of the
>>other unrelated things you have brought up.
>
>If you read the Title of the primary message, you can see who know nothing about
>the Topic ("Not impressed with Hydra: Crafty would Crush Hydra in tourney" ***
>learn to read rthe subject*** :)))) ). If any comment was or not relevant for
>you about Venezuela, I dont mind. I mentioned anything about Venezuela as I
>could have mentioned the weather in China and then? I dont find any relevance in
>your cheaps messages that are not useful for this Forum either.
1)you did not make clear that part of your response is not against claims of Bob
Hyatt when your first post was a reply to Hyatt's post.
Bob Hyatt is not the person who started this subject so if you want to respond
about the fact that we have no evidence to know that Crafty is stronger than
Hydra then you should make clear that you do not respond to Hyatt's claim or not
respond directly to hyatt's post.
2)You are not the blind defender of Vincent like Russell suggested here
but the fact that you only responded to nonsense that was not posted by vincent
made that impression.
If you respond in that post about nonsense that Hyatt did not post, then you
should also respond to nonsense that Vincent posted later, if you do not want
people to think that you support vincent in this thread.
Hyatt could reply in a slightly better way but I think that most people
understood his message that was not:"Vincent has no right to talk because of not
participating in CCT6" but:
"By the logic of Vincent he has no right to talk because of not participating
in CCT6"
3)No problem with making clear that there are justified reasons for you not to
operate Diep in CCT6 but you should make clear that it is not a response against
Hyatt because Hyatt did not claim that your reasons are unjustified.
Hyatt's post was against Vincent's post and not against you and by the way that
you responded people could get the impression that you support Vincent or think
that Bob really blame you for not operating Diep in CCT6.
Uri
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.