Author: Dann Corbit
Date: 15:29:27 04/01/04
Go up one level in this thread
On April 01, 2004 at 17:59:38, Eugene Nalimov wrote: >On April 01, 2004 at 15:16:34, Marc Bourzutschky wrote: > >>The Chessmaster format is indeed better > >What does it mean "better"? :-) > >It stores less information, thus compresses better. I have an idea that I think would be helpful if you should be so kind as to perform it. Write a scanner that reads your wonderful EGTB files and spits out a two bit state only for each position (won/lost/drawn/broke) to create bitbase files. The reason I suggest it is that a bazillion programmers won't have to reinvent the wheel. I suggest the use of the bitbase files early in the search (completely pulled into ram) and then EGTB at the leaves if the bitbase indicates it is worthwhile.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.