Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Analysis for this FEN ?

Author: Gopikrishna

Date: 11:14:45 07/27/04

How many plies its taking for your engines to find the mate score for this
position?
6kr/1b2bp1p/p6Q/Pp2p3/1q3p2/4B1N1/2PR2PP/6K1 w - - 0 33

Re: Analysis for this FEN ? Volker Böhm 22:39:23 07/27/04
Re: Analysis for this FEN ? -- crafty 19.15 -- mate in 9 found in ply 12 Frank E. Oldham 16:27:52 07/27/04
Re: Analysis for this FEN ? Tor Lattimore 14:34:09 07/27/04
Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 David Dahlem 13:17:13 07/27/04
- Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 F. Huber 14:46:16 07/27/04
  - Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 David Dahlem 16:07:13 07/27/04
  - Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 David Dahlem 16:00:14 07/27/04
    - Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 James T. Walker 17:16:40 07/27/04
      - Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 F. Huber 01:02:43 07/28/04
        
        Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 James T. Walker 04:17:23 07/28/04
        
        Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 David Dahlem 06:47:41 07/28/04
        
        Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 F. Huber 07:21:29 07/28/04
        
        Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 James T. Walker 16:56:28 07/28/04
        
        Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 Gopikrishna 07:06:48 07/28/04
        
        Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 F. Huber 07:16:12 07/28/04
        
        Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 David Dahlem 07:31:41 07/28/04
        
        Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 F. Huber 08:31:14 07/28/04
        
        Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 David Dahlem 08:41:50 07/28/04
        
        Re: Chest UCI - Mate in 9 David Dahlem 07:14:49 07/28/04
Re: Analysis for this FEN ? John Merlino 13:15:31 07/27/04
Re: Analysis for this FEN ? Tim Foden 12:35:06 07/27/04
- Re: tim theres a wrong move !! Gopikrishna 13:05:52 07/27/04
  - Re: tim theres a wrong move !! Tim Foden 13:51:02 07/27/04
    - Re: tim theres a wrong move !! Daniel Clausen 13:57:44 07/27/04
      - Re: tim theres a wrong move !! Tim Foden 14:13:13 07/27/04
        
        Re: sorry tim :) Gopikrishna 15:10:02 07/27/04
- Sorry, typo in previous: *12* ply for mate in 11. (n/t) Tim Foden 12:36:34 07/27/04
  - doh! I meant *12* ply for mate in *9*! (n/t) Tim Foden 12:37:53 07/27/04
Re: Analysis for this FEN ? Robert Hyatt 11:53:24 07/27/04
- Re: Analysis for this FEN ? Gopikrishna 12:24:42 07/27/04
  - Re: Analysis for this FEN ? Robert Hyatt 12:46:08 07/27/04

This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.