Author: Jorge Pichard
Date: 09:28:11 08/02/04
Go up one level in this thread
On August 02, 2004 at 11:10:35, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >On August 02, 2004 at 09:23:03, Peter Fendrich wrote: > >>On August 02, 2004 at 09:18:37, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >> >>>Poor Baron. We all know that KBN-K arises in _every_ game. Why, not being able >>>to win that endgame must be worth almost 0.0001 elo. >>> >>>anthony >> >>OTOH it's quite easy to implement so the "achieved elo"/"devolpment time" >>is not that bad... >> >>/Peter > >Of course, but Jorge acts like the sky is falling. > >anthony It only take a GM to know the opponent weakness to force X program to accept an exchange. For instance the GM could have a significant losing game by having a Rook and a pawn versus the program with two knights and two Bishops. But if the GM human player knows that the program doesn't know how to Mate with a KBN vs K, all that he has to do is force the exchange of his rook and pawn for one of his bishop and knight, and the rest will end in a 50 moves draw :-) Pichard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.