Computer Chess Club Archives

Search

Messages

Subject: Re: Sempron vs. Athlon 64: Proof that Crafty's working set is < 256k

Author: Tom Kerrigan

Date: 00:11:59 08/22/04

Go up one level in this thread

On August 21, 2004 at 17:48:08, Robert Hyatt wrote:

>That is _all_ I have said.  I don't know what my working set is.  I don't care
>what it is.  I do know that for two different testers, bigger cache was faster,
>for Tom it wasn't.  Why that is I have no idea, I really don't care, and I don't
>see any point in investigating further.

I didn't test 256k to 512k at all, remember? That was from a hardware review
site that I have nothing to do with.

I did run the 512k to 1024k experiment and my dual proc experiment, both of
which confirm the conclusion that I drew from Anandtech's data.

-Tom

• Re: Sempron vs. Athlon 64: Proof that Crafty's working set is < 256k Robert Hyatt 08:18:43 08/22/04
  • Re: Sempron vs. Athlon 64: Proof that Crafty's working set is < 256k Tom Kerrigan 14:20:08 08/22/04
    • Re: Sempron vs. Athlon 64: Proof that Crafty's working set is < 256k Robert Hyatt 15:24:44 08/22/04
      • Re: Sempron vs. Athlon 64: Proof that Crafty's working set is < 256k Tom Kerrigan 18:22:30 08/22/04
        • Re: Sempron vs. Athlon 64: Proof that Crafty's working set is < 256k Robert Hyatt 19:50:47 08/22/04
  • Re: Sempron vs. Athlon 64: (more) Robert Hyatt 08:35:47 08/22/04

This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.