Author: Uri Blass
Date: 03:21:14 11/10/04
Go up one level in this thread
On November 09, 2004 at 20:44:14, chandler yergin wrote: >On November 09, 2004 at 17:53:34, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On November 09, 2004 at 17:10:02, Anthony Cozzie wrote: >> >>>You are missing the point, Chandler. >>> >>>You probably played through the game with Shredder 8 on. At that point, it >>>found that some of the positions it originally thought were good for black, were >>>in fact good for white, and it recorded them. You then returned to the initial >>>position, and boom! it has learned from its mistakes. >>> >>>What is the difference you ask? The point is that Shredder would not play those >>>moves on its own, without help from a human, without a very long time to search. >>> >>>anthony >> >>Thanks, >>Your explanation is better than my explanation and I hope that finally Chandler >>will understand the point. >> >>Uri > >You all 'miss' my Point! >and.. miss the capability of the Search Engine! >CY We miss nothing The capability of the search engine after learning is simply irrelevant for this discussion. The discussion was about the question if engines can find the move in a game without previous knowledge that humans give him from analysis. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.