Author: Sune Fischer
Date: 08:08:11 02/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2005 at 11:01:32, Arturo Ochoa wrote: >>>I repeated twice my explanation, if you dont understand it. It is not my >>>problem. >> >>You don't want to tell me your results that's fine, but I hope you realize that >>claiming 10 of 10 is nonsense. >> > >It is an idiocy to accuse somebody of saying somthing. If you had read >carefully, the 10-10 was an example to show easily the result of 30%. > >However, you dont read simply. That is nothing that I can do with that. I'm not interested in 1 example, I'm interested in Elo, ie. what can be expected on the average. If you claim 10 of 10 it's just not a representative example. This whole book / anti-book / anti-anti-book / anti-anti-anti-book competition seems real silly to me, but if there is enough Elo to be found.... -S. >AO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.