Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 08:39:31 02/19/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 19, 2005 at 11:08:11, Sune Fischer wrote: >On February 19, 2005 at 11:01:32, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>>>I repeated twice my explanation, if you dont understand it. It is not my >>>>problem. >>> >>>You don't want to tell me your results that's fine, but I hope you realize that >>>claiming 10 of 10 is nonsense. >>> >> >>It is an idiocy to accuse somebody of saying somthing. If you had read >>carefully, the 10-10 was an example to show easily the result of 30%. >> >>However, you dont read simply. That is nothing that I can do with that. > >I'm not interested in 1 example, I'm interested in Elo, ie. what can be expected >on the average. I gave a percentage but I wont point out the opponents. Neither some people this nor your way to flame will essential information in my preparation. If you understand what 30% means. It is Ok. If you understood my example (although I doubt it based on your previous postins), It is Ok. If you think, that a book tuned by hand is silly and it doesnt represent any useful thing. You will be sucked in official Tournaments. That´all. > >If you claim 10 of 10 it's just not a representative example. > Every unique result wont be representative for you. So it is useless to explain what I mean. >This whole book / anti-book / anti-anti-book / anti-anti-anti-book competition >seems real silly to me, but if there is enough Elo to be found.... > That is the reason why you engine will be always beated. It is sillier to reply a topic without being interested. What are your intentions there? Flame the topic? AO.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.