Author: Arturo Ochoa
Date: 18:33:23 02/27/05
Go up one level in this thread
On February 27, 2005 at 20:56:05, Peter Skinner wrote: >On February 27, 2005 at 19:32:22, Arturo Ochoa wrote: > >>How do you know that Diep has an elo of XXXX based on fatuous initial values. > >I used the values from the tournaments that you quoted from last year. > >So the values are _exactly_ how you stated that it's rating last year was above >2400. I only proved you correct, and now you are doubting the results. > >Again.. are you sure you aren't Vincent? > Are you sure you are not Uri Blass?? You must not be mental sane to accusse of usurping identities. Slandering and defaming doesnt say anything good of your person. Please, dont tell me that I am Vincent Diepeveen. >>Diep doesnt participate in the SSFD list so this list is not relevant for your >>purposes. > >Would you prefer I used the performance rating of all the others in said >tournaments? ?? I know you sympathize a lot with Crafty but I have not mentioned Crafty in this matter. Crafty is not a problem. The problem is how you manipulate the results of the Tournament Paderborn 2005 in an useless elo Table. > >Is that is the case, then Diep was 14th. Amazingly right behind Crafty :) > I dont know how you can deduce that since Crafty and Diep only met in in the WCC2004. More nonsense added. It is really sad. >>The SSDF only say a performance of the engines that are there. I dont see Diep >>there. Just useless to show any performance about Diep. > >Well that is a fantastic question... why _isn't_ Diep there? > That is question that It is not my matter. But, you mentioned a list where it is not relevant for the matter in discussion. In this sense, you failed to show anything. Arturo.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.