Author: Klaus Wlotzka
Date: 10:07:32 05/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 2005 at 12:32:26, Uri Blass wrote: >On May 15, 2005 at 11:59:16, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: > >>On May 15, 2005 at 11:42:09, Uri Blass wrote: >> >>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:21:21, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>> >>>>If you haven't noticed it yet, Shredder 9 UCI doesn't play only in the >>>>CSS-computer rating list in another league. >>>> >>>>The difference of 100 Elo is relatively surely high. However, this lies well >>>>that "Shredder" likes short time controls. Furthermore "Shredder" copes with >>>>almost every opening system. Since there play at the CSS-computer rating list >>>>without books but with 10 modified SeE- positions, this yields broader >>>>advantages for "Shredder". >>>> >>>>Klaus Wlotzka >>> >>> >>>I think that this test is more interesting for me >>>I am more interested in testing that is done in that way and I hope that they >>>will test next version of Movei. >>> >>>I do not understand how they choose engines to test(for example I see Jonny2.64 >>>that did not aualify and I do not see Jonny2.75). >>> >>>Uri >> >> >>Hello Uri, >> >>a complete test run with an engine (480 games) lasts for always about 2 weeks. >>It can therefore last sometimes up to a year till it is a new version's turn >>again. So also at Jonny. >> >>I am testing "Spike 0.9a" at the moment, the following tests are planned after >>this: >> >>a.) Zappa 1.0 >>b.) Little Goliath Evolution >> >>I don't know whether Movei already plays so strongly to qualify for the >>CSS-computer rating list. I will look at the previous test reports more >>closely. >> >>Klaus > >In that case there is at least a month before testing Movei in case that you >test it after Little Goliath Evolution and I hope to have better Movei at that >time to be strong enough for the list. > >Uri Hello Uri, I have looked at the rating list of "Leo Dijksman", "Movei" stands approximately on a level with "Little Goliath" there. I will parallel test Movei with "Little Goliath". This would be approximately in three weeks. I use a short test for it. The short test works so: To, in future, find possible new candidates faster who shows a sufficient playing strength for the qualification into the CSS-computer rating list new engines will unite short test undergone for the time being. The test candidate plays all 10 opening specification positions against all engines put in the current rating list after the following scheme: a.) opening specification positions 1-3 against the engines of rank 1-8 b.) opening specification positions 4-6 against the engines of rank 9-16 c.) opening specification positions 7-10 against the engines of rank 17-24 After this scheme a test run arises with altogether 168 games. This should reach to a first playing strength assessment. The candidate reaches a score in the area of the engine put on rank 25 becomes the test continual, otherwise a demolition is carried out. The results of the candidate are listed at demolition in the "eternal rating list". Therefore, if you still publish a more current engine within the next 3 weeks, then I would like to test the newer one of course. You also can send me an e-mail. You find my address here: http://www.wlotzka-computerschach.de/ Yours sincerely Klaus
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.