Author: gerold daniels
Date: 12:48:36 05/15/05
Go up one level in this thread
On May 15, 2005 at 13:07:32, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >On May 15, 2005 at 12:32:26, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On May 15, 2005 at 11:59:16, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >> >>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:42:09, Uri Blass wrote: >>> >>>>On May 15, 2005 at 11:21:21, Klaus Wlotzka wrote: >>>> >>>>>If you haven't noticed it yet, Shredder 9 UCI doesn't play only in the >>>>>CSS-computer rating list in another league. >>>>> >>>>>The difference of 100 Elo is relatively surely high. However, this lies well >>>>>that "Shredder" likes short time controls. Furthermore "Shredder" copes with >>>>>almost every opening system. Since there play at the CSS-computer rating list >>>>>without books but with 10 modified SeE- positions, this yields broader >>>>>advantages for "Shredder". >>>>> >>>>>Klaus Wlotzka >>>> >>>> >>>>I think that this test is more interesting for me >>>>I am more interested in testing that is done in that way and I hope that they >>>>will test next version of Movei. >>>> >>>>I do not understand how they choose engines to test(for example I see Jonny2.64 >>>>that did not aualify and I do not see Jonny2.75). >>>> >>>>Uri >>> >>> >>>Hello Uri, >>> >>>a complete test run with an engine (480 games) lasts for always about 2 weeks. >>>It can therefore last sometimes up to a year till it is a new version's turn >>>again. So also at Jonny. >>> >>>I am testing "Spike 0.9a" at the moment, the following tests are planned after >>>this: >>> >>>a.) Zappa 1.0 >>>b.) Little Goliath Evolution >>> >>>I don't know whether Movei already plays so strongly to qualify for the >>>CSS-computer rating list. I will look at the previous test reports more >>>closely. >>> >>>Klaus >> >>In that case there is at least a month before testing Movei in case that you >>test it after Little Goliath Evolution and I hope to have better Movei at that >>time to be strong enough for the list. >> >>Uri > >Hello Uri, > >I have looked at the rating list of "Leo Dijksman", "Movei" stands approximately >on a level with "Little Goliath" there. I will parallel test Movei with "Little >Goliath". This would be approximately in three weeks. I use a short test for it. >The short test works so: > >To, in future, find possible new candidates faster who shows a sufficient >playing strength for the qualification into the CSS-computer rating list new >engines will unite short test undergone for the time being. The test candidate >plays all 10 opening specification positions against all engines put in the >current rating list after the following scheme: > >a.) opening specification positions 1-3 against the engines of rank 1-8 >b.) opening specification positions 4-6 against the engines of rank 9-16 >c.) opening specification positions 7-10 against the engines of rank 17-24 > >After this scheme a test run arises with altogether 168 games. This should reach >to a first playing strength assessment. The candidate reaches a score in the >area of the engine put on rank 25 becomes the test continual, otherwise a >demolition is carried out. The results of the candidate are listed at >demolition in the "eternal rating list". > > >Therefore, if you still publish a more current engine within the next 3 weeks, >then I would like to test the newer one of course. > >You also can send me an e-mail. You find my address here: >http://www.wlotzka-computerschach.de/ > >Yours sincerely > >Klaus good afternoon Klaus. goliath LGE is a pretty strong engine it will certainly be a good test for movei. gerold.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.