Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 18:45:56 08/14/05
Go up one level in this thread
On August 14, 2005 at 21:30:08, Peter Skinner wrote: >On August 14, 2005 at 21:24:57, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On August 14, 2005 at 21:02:33, Peter Skinner wrote: >> >>>On August 14, 2005 at 17:51:50, Theo van der Storm wrote: >>> >>>> # Name 1 2 P BU SB G >>>> 1 Fruit 6b1 10w1 2.0 1.5 1.50 2 >>>> 2 Zappa 5w1 9b1 2.0 1.5 1.50 2 >>>> 3 Crafty 4b= 7b1 1.5 2.5 1.75 2 >>>> 4 Shredder 3w= 8b1 1.5 2.5 1.75 2 >>>> 5 The Crazy Bishop 2b0 12w1 1.0 2.0 0.00 2 >>>> 6 Jonny 1w0 11b1 1.0 2.0 0.00 2 >>>> 7 Deep Junior 11b1 3w0 1.0 1.5 0.00 2 >>>> 8 Diep 12b1 4w0 1.0 1.5 0.00 2 >>>> 9 Deep Sjeng 10b= 2w0 0.5 2.5 0.25 2 >>>> 10 The Baron 9w= 1b0 0.5 2.5 0.25 2 >>>> 11 Fute_MT 7w0 6w0 0.0 2.0 0.00 2 >>>> 12 IsiChess MMX 8w0 5b0 0.0 2.0 0.00 2 >>>> >>>> # Name 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 P BU SB >>>> 1 Fruit X . . . . 1 . . . 1 . . 2.0 1.5 1.50 >>>> 2 Zappa . X . . 1 . . . 1 . . . 2.0 1.5 1.50 >>>> 3 Crafty . . X ½ . . 1 . . . . . 1.5 2.5 1.75 >>>> 4 Shredder . . ½ X . . . 1 . . . . 1.5 2.5 1.75 >>>> 5 The Crazy Bishop . 0 . . X . . . . . . 1 1.0 2.0 0.00 >>>> 6 Jonny 0 . . . . X . . . . 1 . 1.0 2.0 0.00 >>>> 7 Deep Junior . . 0 . . . X . . . 1 . 1.0 1.5 0.00 >>>> 8 Diep . . . 0 . . . X . . . 1 1.0 1.5 0.00 >>>> 9 Deep Sjeng . 0 . . . . . . X ½ . . 0.5 2.5 0.25 >>>>10 The Baron 0 . . . . . . . ½ X . . 0.5 2.5 0.25 >>>>11 Fute_MT . . . . . 0 0 . . . X . 0.0 2.0 0.00 >>>>12 IsiChess MMX . . . . 0 . . 0 . . . X 0.0 2.0 0.00 >>>> >>>>Fute_MT = Futé Multi-Threading by Jean-Louis Boussin. >>>> >>>>Theo >>>> >>>>PS: For more results and background information do not go to: >>>>http://www.cs.unimaas.nl/icga/news/wccc/2005/results.php >>> >>> >>>Did you use Swiss Perfect to generate this? or PGNExtract? >>> >>>Peter >> >> >>I did not realize that Crafty had had two blacks in a row. How in the hell is >>that possible after only two rounds have been played? Is someone on drugs over >>there or what??? >> >>Even worse, why would Crafty have two blacks in a row, against the two top >>seeds? >> >>Seems a bit strange, to say the least. >> >>The TD apparently needs a brain transplant... > >I questioned the initial pairings as well. How did Crafty get black against >Shredder in the first round? It would have had to be seeded 11 or 12 to get >that?? No?? > >Peter Jaap has never used normal pairing rules. In a 12 player Swiss, round 1 should see #1 play #7, #2 vs #8, etc. Assuming Shredder was #1, Crafty would have to be #7 which is pretty funny. Or assuming Junior was #1 and Shredder was #2, then Crafty would have to have been seeded #8 which is even funnier. who knows what happens over there?
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.