Author: Steve B
Date: 14:45:37 11/04/05
Go up one level in this thread
> >Which however might be different than the tournament strength. Another point >which makes it difficult is that the normalized results may differ from one >opponent to another. Usually it's best to lump all results against all opponents >together which the "boyz" at schachcomputer.info do, if I got it right... :) >(however they use only tournament and 30min/game time controls for their lists). > personally i am not so happy with the opponents the Res-Ruffian faced for its 2383 rating it gained alot of points against weaker opposition and did not even play the R40 so sometimes this "lumping of results" is a mixed blessing also on these lists the version 2.5 R30 is lower then the 2.2 R30 which i think is a bizarre result but perhaps your right and the sample size is just too low to carry any meaningful analysis and as you know so well, it is hard to allocate time for these matches.. even only 5 games at 60 min is ten hours of testing and i already have tested the Res more then any owner has so maybe i should just wait for these ssdf results(assuming the matches will be against other dedicated units and not PC Engines which is rediculous) Steve
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.