Author: Rolf Tueschen
Date: 13:45:31 12/23/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2005 at 15:51:57, Robert Hollay wrote: >What more he has to do? To lash his back until blood? Could you please tone down a bit? Of course I want to get the amputation of his four limbs! That's the minimum. Then I can also tell you what he should do. He shouldnt write such a crap, I quote: ">this was an interesting year for me. i learned a lot of the human psyche. i >learned that some people can´t forgive, that on one day all people are >enthusiastic for engine x and on the other day for engine y. and finally, that a lot of people take the hobby computer chess to seriously." This is hilarious. He insinutaed that people who once liked the cheated Fruit version would now dump it for no reasons. I say that a convicted cheater shouldnt accuse the community this way. I hope that one has the right to speak out one's free opinion. However we could also worship such a wrongdoing by belittling the guilt. We could then attack the critics against such a betrayal. Your question is reveiling a wrong motivation. You ask how many times he should be punished. I dont quite understand it. I would say, each time he appears and insults the community for its criticism of fraud someone should set the record straight. Easy one, no? Further questions? Please ask.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.