Author: Robert Hollay
Date: 00:32:31 12/24/05
Go up one level in this thread
On December 23, 2005 at 16:45:31, Rolf Tueschen wrote: >On December 23, 2005 at 15:51:57, Robert Hollay wrote: > >>What more he has to do? To lash his back until blood? > >Could you please tone down a bit? Of course I want to get the amputation of his >four limbs! That's the minimum. > >Then I can also tell you what he should do. He shouldnt write such a crap, I >quote: > >">this was an interesting year for me. i learned a lot of the human psyche. i >>learned that some people can´t forgive, that on one day all people are >>enthusiastic for engine x and on the other day for engine y. and finally, that a lot of people take the hobby computer chess to seriously." > >This is hilarious. He insinutaed that people who once liked the cheated Fruit >version would now dump it for no reasons. I say that a convicted cheater >shouldnt accuse the community this way. > >I hope that one has the right to speak out one's free opinion. However we could >also worship such a wrongdoing by belittling the guilt. We could then attack the >critics against such a betrayal. > >Your question is reveiling a wrong motivation. You ask how many times he should >be punished. I dont quite understand it. I would say, each time he appears and >insults the community for its criticism of fraud someone should set the record >straight. Easy one, no? Further questions? Please ask. Not all of us have a thick skin. Thomas was humiliated here several times already. He is ashamed of himself for his act. Respectable members here forgave him. I just don't want to drive away a valuable progammer from here. Don't know how many lines he changed in Fruit, but he succeeded to make it significantly stronger. I have no further questions. merry Christmas, Robert
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.